Implementation of School Improvement Plan (SIP) in Samar and Catbalogan City Divisions: Basis for a Development Plan
Keywords:
Implementation, School Improvement Plan (SIP), Development PlanAbstract
This study was conducted to determine the extent of implementation of School Improvement Plan in Samar and Catbalogan City Divisions as well as the degree of involvement of the education stakeholders represented by the members of the School Planning team from every respondent school. This study utilized descriptive-developmental research design to find out the extent of implementation of the school improvement plan (SIP) that will serve as basis for conceptualizing strategic plan and improvement of school-based management. The study focused on quantitative research design and analyses on the different indicators considered, using documentary analysis as a major tool in gathering data. On the extent of implementation along goals and objectives, 39 or 57.35 percent respondent-schools rated fell the score range of 6-10 and was interpreted as “moderately implemented”, 22 or 32.35 percent of the school-respondents were rated “fairly implemented” and 7 or 10.29 percent fell the range of 11-13 and was interpreted as “fully implemented” with an average of 6.28 which means “moderately implemented” and a standard deviation of 2.75. the goals and objectives, performance targets, school improvement process, resource management, school performance accountability, implementation strategies and timelines are moderately implemented by the respondent-schools. This means that every school was trying their best to disseminate the importance and existence of plans to internal and external stakeholders.
References
BOOKS
Corcoran, J. Self-Managing School. London: Falmer Press. 2003.
DepEd, Handbook for the Preparation of the School Improvement Plan, 2006.
DepEd, Primer on School-Community Partnership, 2006.
DepEd, Primer on School-Based Management Program, 2006.
EIC, School Improvement Planning Handbook, 2000.
Hanushek and Woessmann, 2007.
Schmoker, Mike. School Improvement Plan in Maryland, 2004.
JOURNALS/PERIODICALS/PUBLICATION
American Institutes of Research, 2005.
Briggs and Wohlstetter, 1999. Key Elements of a Successful School-Based Management Strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(30, 351-372).
Education Improvement Commission, November 2000.
Khattri, Nidhi, Ling, Cristina and Jha, Shreyasi, “The Effects of School-Based Management in the Philippines: An Initial Assessment Using Administrative Data, Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank Independent Evaluation Group East Asia Education Sector Unit and Work Bank Institute, March 2010.
Kochan, et al, “Gathering and Analyzing Intensive School-Level Process Data - A Review of SEAP-II,” The Lousiana School Effectiveness and Assistance Program (SEAP), 2001.
Leithwood and Menzies. What do we Already know about Successful School Leadership? Prepared for the AERA Division: A task Force on Developing research in Educational Leadership. Retrieved: 5 October 1998 from http://www.cepa.gse.rutgers.edu. 1998.
Lewis, J. Preparing Students for democratic Citizenship: Codes of Conduction. Victoria’s School of the Future. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 41-60.
Meza, James and Sam Stringfield, “Tying School Improvement to School Accountability: A Review of SEAP-III,” The Lousiana School Effectiveness and Assistance Program (SEAP), 2001.
UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
Burden, Joe Jr. W., “Assessing Ethno-relative Pedagogical Preparedness in Pete Programs,” Ph. D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, May 2007.
Creemers, Bert, “Capacity for change and Adaptation of Schools in the Case of Effective School Improvement,” A research project with the final report, “A Framework for Effective School Improvement,” completed on July 6, 2001 at the Institute for Educational Research, Gion Westernhaven 15, Groningen, The Netherlands, 2001.
Heroman, et al, “The SEAP Process-Illustrative Case Studies from SEAP-II and III,” The Louisiana School Effectiveness and Assistance Program (SEAP), 2001.
Jogthong, Chalermsri, et al, “The Development of Teachers’ Potential in Teaching English for Level 1 and Level 2 Students in Partnership Schools for Teacher Professional Development by Implementing Participatory Action Research Process,” Unpublished Dissertation, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Thailand, 2006.
Kennedy, Eugene, Mandeville, Garrett and Crone, Linda, “Analyzing Statewid School Effectiveness Datasets Accurately and Fairly - A Review of SEAP-I, Integrating School Indicators, School Effectiveness, and School Improvement Research - The Louisiana School Effectiveness and Assistance Program (SEAP), 2001.
Pimolbunyong, Rosarin, et al, “The Development of Teachers and schools for Cooperative Teacher Professional Development,” Unpublished Dissertation, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Thailand, 2004.
Reynolds, david and Charles Teddlie, “Joining School Indicator, School Effectiveness, and School Improvement Research - The International Perspective,” Integrating School Indicators, School Effectiveness and School Improvement Research - The Louisiana School Effectiveness Assistance Program (SEAP), 2001.
Yap, Ingrid R. and Adorio, Mercedes P., “School-Based Management: Promoting Special Education Programs in Local Schools,” Unpublished Dissertation, U. P. College of Education, December 2008.
OTHER SOURCES
World Bank, “ What is School-Based Management,” November 2007.
