Productivity of Agrarian Reform Communities (ARC) in Samar

Authors

  • Aida Gamba Samar State University
  • Felisa Gomba Samar State University

Keywords:

Productivity, Agrarian Reform Communities, Samar

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the productivity, sustainability and feasibility of the strategies used, on the different projects and programs of Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARB) in Agrarian Reform Communities (ARC) in Samar, from 2000 to 2012. The research also employed other data gathering instruments such as unstructured interviews, documentary analysis and actual observations. These methods were used to describe, record, analyze, interpret and certain some facts in order to come up with a substantial and meaningful study. The first five problems encountered by the ARBs relative to the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program were: Rank 1, lack of financial farm capital; Rank 2, lack of farm inputs (fertilizers, insecticide, pesticides, etc.); rank 3, lack of farm machineries (hand tractor, thresher); Rank 4, lack of water pump in areas with no irrigation - Calbiga, Gandara; Rank 5; lack of farm to market road (from Sitio Galutan to Gandara proper). the productivity of the ARBs in terms of income was influenced by the locally funded projects in an inverse relationship. On the other hand, the locally funded projects did not significantly influence the productivity of ARBs along off-farm and non-farm endeavors.  The productivity of the ARBs in terms of income influenced by the foreign funded projects did not significantly influence the productivity of ARBs along off-farm and non-farm endeavors. Thhe ARBs encountered problems relative to Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program which need to be addressed by the implementers and other concerned. For the recommendation, a sequel study may be conducted considering other areas to assess the implementation of the program and the productivity of the ARBs. 

 

References

BOOKS

Innovative Approaches and Success Stories on Agrarian Reform Development p. 5.6 author. Jose Mari Ponce. Copyright 2002.

Living in the Environment. Principles Connections and Solutions, 11th Edition. G. Tyler Miller, Jr. P. 767-768

Miguel A. Bernard, S.J. “Joseph A. Mulry: Foundation of Social Justice Movement” in Unusual and Ordinary: Biographical Sketches of Some Philippine Jesuits (Jesuit Communications Foundation, Quezon City, 2006).

Joseph Propenko, Improving Productivity in developing countries, Management Development Working Paper No. 16 (Geneva, ILO, 1978).

Borjal, Artemio A., The Philippines: Struggle for Tenants Emancipation, 1st ed., Manila: DAR, 1981.

HANDTOOLS “A MANUAL on Agrarian Reform Community Planning and Development,” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Technical Support to Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (FAO-TSARRD) and the Department of Agrarian Reform.

Bliumin, I. G. Kritika burzhuaznoi politicheskoi ekonomii, vol. 1. Moscow, 1962. Nikitin, S. M. Teorii stoimosti I ikh evoliutsii. Moscow, 1970

Bates, W. (2001), How Much Government? The Effect of High Government Spending on Economic Performance. New Zealand Business Roundtable, Wllington, August 2001.

EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT in TEVET Teechnical and vocational Education and Training Nov. 3-5, 2010 p. 347-348

Diewert, W.E., 2004. Index Number Concepts, Measures and Decomposition of Productivity Growth., Journal of productivity Analysis 19, pp. 8

Gilberto M. Llanto, 2012. The Impact of Infrastructure on Agricultural Productivity. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES NO. 2012-12

APO, 2003. Agrarian Reforms and Agricultural Productivity. Report of the APO Study Meeting on Agrarian Reforms and Agricultural Productivity Sri Lanka, 28 May-2 June 2001

UNPULISHED MATERIALS

Bacurio, Bernanrdino A. “The Rural Development Model in the First District of SAMAR.” Unpublished Thesis, SSPC, March 2012.

JOURNALS/MAGAZINES/PERIODICALS

Gallardo, Richard B. 2015. “Selling Farm Products the I.T. Way. “ Agrarian BIZ Magazine. Vol. 1.1 No. 3 May-June 2015

PIA SAMAR Monitor p. 5

ELECTRONIC AND OTHER SOURCES

Administrative Order No. 4, Section 3 b. Series of 2014.

O. 7, Series 2011: 9) Administrative Order (A.O.) No.7, Series of 2011 (Revised Rules and Procedures Governing the Cancellation of Registered Eps (R.A.) No. 6657 as amended).

(A.O. 7, Series 2011: 10) Farmworker.

(A.O. 7, 2014, Article 1, Section 3) Agrarian Reform Beneficiary.

Internet. Dar arccess

Internet google. Work Atitude

https://answer.yahoo.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age

Zulficar Rahmana, H. Mikunib & M. Mostafizar Pahmanc. PDF. DOI. Page 19-33. “Towards Sustainable Farming Development: The Attitude of Farmers in a Selected Area of Shimane Prefecture, Japan.” Published online: 22 Oct 2008

C. Ajayia. PDF. DOI: “User Acceptability of Sustainable Soil Fertility Technologies: “ Lessons from Farmers’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice in Southern Africa. Pages 21-40. Oct. 17, 2008

Saowanee Norkaew, Corporate Author: Chulalongkorn. PDF. “Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of using personal protective equipment (PPE) for chilli-growing farmers in Huarua sub-district, Mueang district, Ubonrachathani province, Thailand, 2009.

(Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia). Farmer

www.dictionary.com/browse/accessibility

Published

2022-08-02

How to Cite

Gamba, A., & Gomba, F. (2022). Productivity of Agrarian Reform Communities (ARC) in Samar. SSU - Digital Archive for Theses and Dissertations, 34(1), 1–213. Retrieved from https://datd.ssu.edu.ph/index.php/datd/article/view/162

Most read articles by the same author(s)