The Level of Motivation and Performance in Research and Extension of Faculty Members of SUC's in Eastern Visayas: Bases For Policy Redirection

Authors

  • Leonida Bernadit Samar State University
  • Eusebio Pacolor Samar State University

Keywords:

Level of Motivation, Performance, Research, Extension, Faculty Members, SUC's

Abstract

Research and Extension play vital roles in Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) being two of the four-fold functions of State Universities and Colleges. The Commission on Higher Education (CHED) is mandated to promote, direct and support Higher Education Institutions in performing their research, extension, production and instruction functions. The study aims to determine the level of motivation and performance in research and extension among SUC’s in Eastern Visayas as bases for policy redirection. It utilized the descriptive-correlational method of research. There were (140) instructors, (85) assistant professors, (75) associate professors and (20) full professors. The respondents of this study were the ten (10) state universities and colleges in Eastern Visayas. The study was conducted during the 2015-2016. The results were statistically treated using frequency count and percentages, arithmetic mean and standard deviation, weighted mean, Pearson-Product-Moment Coefficient Correlation, and Fisher’s t-test. The findings showed that the four groups of faculty-respondents considered their level of performance in the conduct of research as “satisfactory”, considered their level of performance in the conduct of extension as “satisfactory”, they “agreed” on their level of motivation in the in the conduct of research and extension as “highly felt” and “strongly agreed” with the solutions they suggested to address the problems they encountered in research and extension. Inasmuch as the level of performance of the four groups of faculty-respondents in research and extension was found as satisfactory which could be deduced as moderate competence, there is a need for them to enhance it through attendance in training or constantly involving themselves in research and extension.

References

BOOKS

Aganon, Marie E. and Sofronio V. Amante, (20080. Institutional Variables associated with Productivity,” UP-NSTA Project No. 8510-so.

Anderson, P.P. (2012). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068.

Bailey, J.G. (2009). Academics motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(3), 343-359.

Baker, George (2012). “Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement”. Journal of Political Economy 100(3): 598-614.

Baker, George M. (2006). “Distortion and Risk in Optimal Incentive Contracts” Forthcoming, Journal of Human Resources Rosen, Jasjit Signgh, Lars Stole, an anonymous referee, and participants at the NASConference on “Designing Incentives for the Production of Human Capital” for comments on this paper. This research was funded by the Harvard Business School Division of Research. The data used in this article can be obtained beginning October2002 through October 2005 from George P. Baker, Harvard Business School, Baker Library 283, and Soldiers Field Road, Boston, Massachusetts 02163.

Bandura, A. (2007). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Company.

Baron, R. A. (2001) Motivation in Work Setting: Reflections on the Core of Organizational Research. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 1-8.

Buen, Esperanza Cavilan (2009). “The Relationship of Personnel and Work Related Variables of Job Performance”, MA thesis, Ateneo de Manila.

Blackburn, R.T. (2006). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Blackie, M.J., S.S. Snapp, and C. Donovan (2013). “Realigning research and extension to focus on farmers’ constraints and opportunities” Department of Crop and Soil Sciences and Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA, Food Policy 28 (2003) 349-363 University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7TJ, UK Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Bland, C.J., Center, B.A., Finstad, D.A., Risbey, K.R., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 89-123. Faculty Motivation to do Research/ Hardre et al. 63

Boice, R.T. (2012). The academic career as a developmental process. Journal of Higher Education, 52, 598-614.

Boyer, R. J. (2010). Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulated advantage. Research in Higher Education, 31(4), 327-353.

Braskamp, L.A. (2004). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Collins, D.L. (2011). Intra-institutional factors that influence accounting research productivity. Journal of applied Business Research, 17(2), 17-32.

Colbeck, C. (2012). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic interest: The influence of tenure on faculty preference for teaching or research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Minneapolis, MN.

Colbreck, C. (2007). The contexts of academic work: What matters to faculty? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Tucson, AZ.

Commission on Higher Education 1995. The Higher Education Research Agenda 1998-2007.

Commission of Higher Education (CHED) Strategic Plan for 2001-2016

Cruise, Paula A. and Camille Graham. (2014). “The effect of instructor career motivation on student learning strategies and Performance” Journal. Vol. 3, No. 6, 2014, pp. 345-354. Doi: 10.11648/j.edu.20140306.141Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge shire, UK, Department of Career and Employment Studies, Northern Caribbean University (NCU), Manchester, Jamaica.

Daft, R., (2009). “Management” 5th Edition taken from J. Stacey Adams, “Inequity in Social Exchange in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Edition 2, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, New York: Academic Press, 1965, pp. 267-299.

Deci, E.L. (2009). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

De Jesus, Ma. Leonora V. (2005). “Explaining and predicting Filipino Industrial Workers Performance and Satisfaction,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Philippines.

Dembo, E.L. (2004). The support of autonomy and the control of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.

Dicrisi, E.L. (2002). The paradox of achievement: The harder you push, the worse it gets. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Contributions of social psychology (pp. 59-85). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Edward, M.L. (2014). Incentive Compensation When Executives Can Hedge The market: Evidence of relative Performance Evaluation in the Cross Section, International Journal of Education Learning and Development UK Vol. 2, No.2, pp.76-103, June 2014 Published by European Centre for Research Training and development UK (www.ea-journals.org).

Eskew, R.M. & Heneman, B.E. (2006). Changing priorities in the faculty reward system. In R.M. Diamond, & B.E. Adams (Eds.), New Directions for Higher Education, No. 81: Recognizing faculty work: Reward systems for the year 2000 (pp.5-12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Fairweather, J.S. (2002). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Fairweather, J.S. (2012). The highly productive faculty member: Confronting the mythologies of faculty work. In W.G. Tierney (Ed.). Faculty productivity: Facts, fictions, and issues (pp. 55-98). New York, NY: Falmer Press.

Fairweather, J.S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision-making. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26-48.

Feldman, K.S. (2007). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional Faculty Motivation to do Research/Hardre et al. 65 effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227-298.

Feldman, K.A., & Paulsen, M.B. (2009). Faculty motivation: The role of a supportive teaching culture. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 78, 71-78.

Feltham, Gerald, and Jim Xie. (2004). “Performance Measure Congruity and Diversity in Multi-Task Principal/Agent Relations.” The Accounting Review 69(3): 429-453. Political Economy 100(3): 598-614.

Garvey, Gerald M. and Bourn, Toddmil R. (2013). “Incentive Compensation When Executives Can Hedge The Market: Evidence of Relative Performance Evaluation in the Cross Section” International Journal of Education Learning and Development UK Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 76-103, June 2014 Published by European Centre for Research Training and development UK (www.ea-journals.org)

Gill, C.T. (2010). Is faculty research productivity: Influential factors and implications. Information Resources Management Journal, 13(2), 15-25. Journal of the Professoriate (5) 1 66

Gill, J. (2012). The story is not in the numbers: Academic socialization and diversifying the faculty. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 172-185.

Givalamubise, P.L. (2006). What motives university faculty members to do research?: Tenure-track faculty in research-extensive universities. Journal of the Professoriate, 2(1), 75-99.

Goodwin, P.L. (2005). Testing differential effects of computer-based, web-based, and paper-based administration of questionnaire research instruments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 5-22.

Golman, Russell and Sudeep Bhatia (2012). “Performance Evaluation Inflation and Compression” University of Chicago and IZA Bonn, Kenneth A. Merchant, University of Southern California, Wim A. Van der Stede, University of Texas, Dallas, Discussion Paper No. 1356.

Gratz, T.H. (2009). Life cycle productivity in academic research: Evidence from cumulative publication histories of academic economists. Southern Economic Journal, 61(3), 728-743.

Guskin, J.C. (2006). Faculty salary structure in research universities: Implications for productivity. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Faculty Productivity: Facts, Fictions and Issues (pp. 123-173). New York, NY: Falmer Press.

Hattie, J., & Marsh, H.W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507-542.

Harachiewwiez, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Herzberg, E.P. (2009). Personnel economics for managers. New York, NY: Wiley.

Hoshower, R.A. (2006). Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities. Research in Higher education, 45(7), 739-760.

Jackson, G. (2004). Internet versus mailed questionnaires: A randomized comparison. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 6(3), 30.

Kansas State University (2005).

Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (2008). Work Motivation: Forging New Perspective and Directions in the Post-Millennium. In R. Kanfer, G. Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.) New York.

King, P.E. (2007). Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education, 30(5), 531-549.

Krause, R. et al. (2003). Personal and institutional characteristics affecting research productivity of academic accountants. Journal of education for Business, 67(6), 335-341.

Lawler, P., (2004). The academic profession in international perspective. In P. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries 9pp. 3-48). Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Lawler, L. (2010). Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: An expectancy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 179-189.

Lawrence, P. (2005). Factors contributing to success in research and publications: Insights of ‘influential” accounting authors. Journal of accounting Education, 16(3/4). 463-472.

Levitan, A.S., & Ray, R. (2002). Personal and institutional characteristics affecting research productivity of academic accountants. Journal of Education for Business, 67(6), 335-341.

Lovrich, N.P. (2006). Dimensions of stress among university faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national study. Research in Higher Education, 24(3), 266-286.

Locker, W., & Latham, A. (2004). Improving productivity: What faculty think about it- and its effect on quality? Change, 27, 10-21.

Low, J., & Edwards, N.P. (2007). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource management Review, 1(1), 61-89.

McClelland, David C. “Money as a motivator: Some Research Insights.” The McKinsey Quarterly (Fall) 2007, p. 10.

Martinez, Conception R. and Elvira A. Zamora, (2003). “Motivational Strengths and Work Satisfaction Among Some Departmental Heads of Government Corporations in the Philippines”, Discussion Paper No. 83-7, Business Research and Publications Program, University of the Philippines, College of Business Administration.

Martinez, Conception R. (2005), “Top Management Nationality and Need Satisfaction Level of the Workforce in Selected Multinational Corporations in Metro Manila,” Discussion Paper of the Business Research and Publications Program University of the Philippines, College of Business Administration.

Lee, Ruth Anabelle and Alice Tarce, (2001). Productivity and Jobs Behavior and Attitudes in Garment Manufacturing Firms, “Undergraduate Thesis, De la Salle University.

Lopez, Arthur M. (2002). “Some Factors in a Job Satisfaction among Employees in a Five-Star Hotel in Metro Manila, “Master’s Thesis, University of Santo Tomas.

Maslow, K. (2000). Believing is seeing: The influence of beliefs and expectations on post-tenure review in one state system. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 17-43.

Middaugh, M.F. (2010). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for college and universities. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass. Faculty Motivation to do Research/Handre et al. 67

Maxwell, J., & Xie, C. (2007). An analysis of prevailing myths regarding promotion and tenure. Education, 123(3), 635-637.

Meyer, C. (2011). Planning and evaluating a growth program for faculty [Monograph series no. 14.]. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Study of Higher Education, School of Education, University of Michigan.

Miller, D.H. (2006). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Moore, F.E. & Amey, L.A. Institutional factors that motivate research activity in research universities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, St. Louis, MO.

Morris, J.M. & Maisto, L.M. (2002). Motivating others: Nurturing inner motivational resources. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Mwamwwenda, L.J. (2006). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423-446.

Ory, Christopher D. & David F. Lacker (2002). “Determinants of Performance Measure Choices in Worker Incentive Plans.” Journal of Labor Economics 20(2): S58-91.

Prewwitt, & Widgren, A. (2011). Improving productivity: What faculty think about it – and its effect on quality? Change, 27, 10-21.

Ray, C., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Reever, J. (2005). Effects of sample size on the distribution of selected fir indices: A graphical approach. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 759-776.

Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

Roby, D. & Ryan, R.M. (2013). Correlates of faculty publication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education, 39, 201-222.

Roads, F.F. (2005). To what degree does the desire for promotion motivate faculty to perform research? Research in Higher Education, 41(6), 723-752.

Setiawan, Paulus A. (2005). “Employee Job Attitude and Performance in a Government service Institution,” MA Thesis, Ateneo de manila University.

Schon, D.A. (2003).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in America. New York, NY: Basic Books. Journal of the Professoriate (5) 1 68

Schultz, J.J., Meade, J.A., & Khurana, I. (1989). The changing roles of teaching, research and service in the promotion and tenure decisions for accounting faculty. Issues in Accounting Education, 4(1), 109-119.

Scriven, C.J. (2001). Faculty well-being review: An alternative to post-tenure review. In C.M. Licata & J.C. Morreale (Eds.), Post-tenured Faculty review and renewal (pp. 229-241).

Serow, R.C. (2010). Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education, 40, 449-463.

Serow, R.C. & Demry, J. (2009). Faculty perspectives on teaching at a research university. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, San Antonio, TX.

Siblane, J., & Allen, N.P. (2007). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.

Smith, F. F. & Blackburn, R. T. (2003). Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measurement refinement and theory testing. Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 2-22.

The Higher Education Act of 1994 (R.A. 772).

Trautwetter, M.P. & Tierney, W.G. (2011). Reforming faculty work: Culture, structure & the dilemma of organizational change. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1081-1101. Faculty Motivation to do Research/Hardre et al. 69

Vroom, M.F. (2004). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco, CA: Josset-Bass.

Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.

Webster Dictionary (2009).

Widgren, M.B. & Madhav V. Rajan (2005). “The Choice of Performance Measures in Annual Bonus Contracts.” The Accounting Review 72(2): 231-255.

Wong, G.C., & Tierney, E.L. (1996). Internalization of bio psychological values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779.

Wood, F. (2009). Factors influencing research performance of university academic staff. Higher Education, 19, 81-100

UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS

Alamin, Myrna B. “Common Criteria for Evaluation (CCE) and Qualitative Contribution Evaluation (QCE) of Academic Staff of State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in Eastern Visayas, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Samar State University, Catbalogan City, 2005.

Albeza, Norelyn B. “Initial Assessment of the DAT Program.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northern Iloilo State University, Barotac Viejo Campus, 2011.

Bordallo, James T. “Relationship of Work Values, Job Satisfaction and Job Effectiveness of the Faculty of Baguio.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Baguio City, 2012

Daz, Lanielyn R. “Assessment of the Competency Level of Teachers and the Factors that Influence Their Teaching in Technology and Home Economics Subjects.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Eastern Samar State University, Borongan City, 2013.

Dano, Elizabeth V. “Resource Generation in State Universities and Colleges in Eastern Visayas Region: A Reference Model. “An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Leyte Normal University, Tacloban City, 2002.

Gallego, Ezralyn R. “Effectiveness of Master Teachers Assistance and Instructional Competence of Non-Master Teachers: A Correlation.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Eastern Philippines, Catarman, 2010.

Gonzales, Aida J. “Containing Education Activities of Teachers in Selected Public Schools in the Division of Leyte.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Eastern Visayas State University, Tacloban City, 2008.

Perez, Rolando B. “Qualities of Instructors and Professors.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northern Iloilo State University, Barotac Viejo Campus, 2009.

Lonzaga, Eufemia (2004). “Research and Development Program of State University and Colleges in Region VIII, Unpublished Master Thesis, Northern Samar State University, Calbayog City.

Marquez, Elena S. “Correlates of Performance Trilogy of Functions of Faculty in the State Colleges and Universities in Eastern Visayas.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Eastern Visayas State University, Tacloban City, 2007.

Pincas, Grace C. “Job Satisfaction and Job Performance of Devolved Agricultural Extension Workers of the Department of Agriculture in Eastern Samar.” An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, ESSC, Borongan, Eastern Samar, 2010.

Ramirez, Shirly C. “Interpersonal Values and Competency Needs to Public Elementary School Principals: Inputs to a Model Supervisory Enhancement Program.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Eastern Visayas State University, Tacloban City, 2012.

Ramos, Aster E. “The Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of Social Service (CIDSS): Its Implementation and Socio-Economic Impact on Target Beneficiaries.” An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, ESSC, Borongan, Eastern Samar, 2001.

Roncesvalles, Geremer N. (2014). “School Administrators’ Performance of Public Elementary Schools in Gandara II District, Division of Samar”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northwest Samar State University, Calbayog City.

Sale, Flexhton B. “The Trilogy Function of State and Privately Owned Colleges and Universities in Eastern Visayas Region.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Leyte Normal University, Tacloban City, 2010.

Siervo, Leo M. “The Management of Agriculture Extension Project of the Devolved Department of Agriculture in the Province of Eastern Samar.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Leyte Normal University, Tacloban City, 2006.

PUBLISHED MATERIALS

Dee, Thomas and Wyckoff, James. (2013). “James. Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance”: Evidence from IMPACT NBER Working Thesis No. 19529 JEL No. 12, J45.

Dee, Thomas R. and Wyckoff, james, M. (2013). “Incentives, Selection, and Teachers Performance: Evidence from Impact”, Working Paper 19529, NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, October 2013.

Gong, Guojin. (2010). “Relative Performance Evaluation and Related Peer Groupsin Executive Compensation Contracts”, Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, Laura Yue Li, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820.

Glass, Jason E. (2011). “The Influence of Teacher Motivation in the Context of Performance-Based Compensation” Seton hall University, Seton hall University, Reposity @ Seton Hall, Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses, Winter 2011.

Haraldsen, Nina Birgitheand Ostergren, Vaileder: Katarina (2009). “Performance measurement and incentives: A study on performance management in a changing environment” NORGES HANDELSHOYSKOLE Bergen, Spring 2009

Hardre, Patricia L. (2011). “Faculty Motivation to do Research: Across Disciplines in Research-Extensive Universities” University of Oklahoma, Andrea D. BeesleyMid-continent Research for Education and Learning Raymond L. Miller, University of Oklahoma and terry M. Pace, University of Oklahoma IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180.

Kong, Xiangping and King, Richard A. (2001). “performance-Based Pay as a Motivator of Faculty Performance at a Public University” Presented at Division J, the 2001 Annual Conference, American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington.

Lavy, Victor L. (2011). “Evaluating the Effect of Teacher’ Performance Incentiveson Pupil Achivement,” Hebrew University of Jerusalem, revised: August 2011, department of Economics, Hebrew University, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.

Rudhumbu, Norman (2014). “Motivational Strategies in the Teaching of Primary School Mathematics in Zimbabwe”, Senior Lecturer, Botho University P.O. Box 501564, Gaborone, Botswana.

Nairuba, Justine R. (2008). Motivational Practices and Teachers Performance in Jinja Municipality Secondary Schools, Jinja District, Uganda (Under the direction of KAKULE I. KISUNZU, Ph.D.).

Ololube, Nwachukwu Prince (2011). “Teachers Job Satisfaction and Motivation for School Effectiveness: An Assessment” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Helsinki Finland.

Opu, Stella L. (2012). “Motivation and Work Performance: Complexities in Achieving Good Performance Outcomes: A Study Focusing on Motivation Measures and Improving Workers Performance in Kitgum District Local Government” MASTERS OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, (Uganda), The Hague, The Netherlands.

Sampson, James P. Jr., Marcy P. Driscoll, David F. Foulk, and Pamela S. Carroll (2010). “Successful Faculty Performance in Teaching,” Research and Original Creative Work, and Service, Dean of the Faculties Office, Florida State University, April 26, 2010.

Wesley, Annie S. and Merie Faminow (2014). “Background Paper: Research and Development and Extension Services in Agriculture and Food Security” No. 425 December, 2014 Program Manager at the International Development, ASIAN DEVELOPMENT, Research Centre, Canada.

ELECTRONICS REFERENCES

(Microsoft Encarta 2009. 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved)

Food olicy 28 (2003) 349-363 www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol

Email: iza@iza.org

Pc378@cam.ac.uk (P. A. Cruise), Camille.graham@ncu.ecu.jm (C. Graham) www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol

Annie S. Wesley awesley@idrc.ca is Senior Program Specialist, and Merle Faminow MFaminow@idrc.ca is

Gug3@psu.edu, liyue@illinois.edu, Jae Yong Shin, College of Business

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, jyshin@illinois.edu, January 2010

http://www.nber.org/papers/w19529Paula A. Cruise, Camille Graham. The Effect of Instructor Career Motivation on Student Learning Strategies and Performance. Education

msvictor@mscc.huji.ac.il

(www.ea-journals.org) International Journal of Education Learning and Development UK Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 76-103, June 2014 Published by European Centre for Research Training and development UK

Published

2022-05-12

How to Cite

Bernadit, L., & Pacolor, E. (2022). The Level of Motivation and Performance in Research and Extension of Faculty Members of SUC’s in Eastern Visayas: Bases For Policy Redirection. SSU - Digital Archive for Theses and Dissertations, 34(1), 1–258. Retrieved from https://datd.ssu.edu.ph/index.php/datd/article/view/81

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>