Perceptions on the PASKO: Their Relation to the Performance of Key Officials in the Division of Samar
Keywords:
Perceptions, Performance, Relation, Key OfficialsAbstract
This study is an attempt to assess the perceptions of the key officials and the rates on the PASKO (Performance Appraisal System for Key Officials) in the Division of Samar during the school year 1984-1985. More key officials obtained outstanding and very satisfactory performance under the PASKO than under the NPAS. There is a significant relationship between the performance ratings of the key officials under the PASKO and those under the NPAS. There is a significant relationship between the general perception of the respondents on the PASKO and the performance of the key officials. The PASKO is more objective and critical than the NPAS because the rates have to work harder and considerably satisfy the indicators in order to obtain very satisfactory or outstanding performance ratings, which is not under the NPAS. The extent to which the indicators in the PASKO are satisfied by the key officials as perceived by the raters reflects the degree of performance of the key officials as evidenced by the significant relationship between the perceptions of the raters on the PASKO and the actual performance of the key officials. Target-setting negotiations and performance appraisal should be done on the time to help the key officials achieve better. The subordinates and the non-MECS raters should be well acquainted with the indicators in the PASKO.
References
BOOKS
Aquino, Gaudencio V. and Garcia, Ligaya B. Fundamentals of Measurement and Evaluation, National Bookstore, Manila, Philippines, 1978.
Bloom, Benjamin S. et al, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: David McKay Co., 1975.
Campbell William G. Form and Style in Thesis Writing. Houghton Mifflin Company,
Boston, 1969.
Dizon, Amado C. Presidential Decrees on Education and Related Laws, Rex Printing Press,
Q.C. Philippines, 1978.
Flippo, Edwin O. Principles of Personnel Management, New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.,
nd edition, 1966.
Garrett, Henry E. Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York: Longmans, Green and
Co., 1960.
Good, Carter V. Dictionary of Education, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1959.
Gregorio, Herman C. School Administration and Supervision Quezon City, Philippines, R.P.
Garcia Publishing Co., 1978.
Guilford, J.P. Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York: McGraw-Hill
Book Company, 1965.
Lewis, James Jr. School Management by Objectives, West Nyack, New York: Parker
Publishing Co., Reprinted: Q.C. Philippines: Phoenix Press Inc. 1974.
Linguist, E. F. Educational Measurement, Washington D.C. American Council on
Education, 1951.
Micheels, William J. and Karnes, M. Ray Measuring Educational Achievements, New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1950.
Monroe, Walter S. Encyclopedia of Educational Research, New York: The McMillan Co., 1950.
Munn, N.L. et al Introduction to Psychology 2nd edition, Houghton Mifflin Company,
Boston, 1969.
Remmers, H.H. and Case, N.L. Educational Measurement and Evaluation, New York:
Harper and Brothers, 1943.
Ruiz, Macario B. Evaluation and Measurement for Philippine Schools, R. P. Garcia Publishing
Co., Q.C. Philippines, 1967.
Ruiz, Macario B. Foundations of Administration and Supervision for Philippine Schools,
Manila: Abiva Publishing House, 1972.
Sison, Perfecto S. Personnel and Human Resource Development, Philippines: Rex Printing
Co., 1981.
Stoner, James A.F. Management, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall Inc.,
The New Lexicon Webster International Dictionary, USA: The English Language Institute of
America, Inc., 1976.
Thorndike, Robert L. and Hagen, Elizabeth Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and
Education, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1959.
Thorndike, Robert L. Personnel Selection, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1955.
Travers, Robert M. W. Educational Measurement, New York: McMillan Co., 1955.
UNPUBLISHED WORKS
Cananua, Alejandro E. “Teachers’ Performance Evaluation in Trade-Technical Schools in
Samar”, unpublished master’s thesis, Marikina Institute of Science and
Technology, 1978.
Espinosa, Oscar C. “Factors Related to the Job Performance of Teachers in Agricultural
Schools in Eastern Samar”, unpublished master’s thesis, Leyte Institute of
Technology, March 1983.
Pulga-Uy, Estrella “A study of the Administrative Performance of the Public General
Secondary School Administrators in the Division of Leyte during the School year 1976-
”, unpublished master’s thesis, Leyte Institute of Technology, March 1977.
Umacod, Dolores P. “A Critical Study of the Bureau of Public Schools Performance Rating
System to Classroom Teachers of Tolosa District, 1964-1965”, unpublished master’s
thesis, Leyte Normal School, 1967.
PERIODICALS
Barbaran, Monserat C. “Concepts and Issues in Appraising the Performance of Teachers”
PASUC Baliham, Vol. III, No. 3, July-September 1983.
Meyer, Robert H. “Split roles in Performance Appraisal” Harvard Business Review,
January-February, 1965.
DOCUMENTS
MEC Order No. 2, s. 1979 dated January 9, 1979.
MEC Order No. 19, s. 1982, dated May 24, 1982.
