Common Criteria for Evaluation (CCE) and Qualitative Contribution Evaluation (QCE) of Academic Staff of State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) in Eastern Visayas
Keywords:
Common Criteria for Evaluation of Academic Staff of State Universities and Colleges, Qualitative Contribution Evaluation of Academic Staff of State Universities and Colleges, SUCsAbstract
This study determined the effectiveness and relevance of the CCE and QCE of academic staff of SUCs in the Eastern Visayas. This study utilized a descriptive method of research using comparative and correlational analyses. The CCE and QCE points earned, based on the NBC 461, of the instructors, assistant professors, associate professors, associate professors and professors were determined and associated with their academic ranks. Likewise, the CCE and QCE points earned by the four groups of respondents were compared by SUC category and rank. The combined responses of the four groups of respondents resulted to the following top three solutions: 1) Expose staff to new technologies through sending them to training actually use operation of modern machineries and internets or computers, 2) Have adequate supply of tools, equipment and instructional materials needed for instruction, and 3) Create income generating projects that will augment additional income of the college/university for the purchase of modern instructional facilities, equipment and materials, with overall means of 4.02, 3.92 and 3.88, respectively. This indicated the necessity of staff development, enhancing the equipment and facilities of the state college or university as well as strengthening the production function to address the problems relative to NBC 461 evaluation. As regards relevance of CCE instruments, the professors’ group gave the highest rating, followed by the instructors, assistant professors and associate professors. However, for the effectiveness of the CCE instruments, the ratings given by the four groups of respondents were more or less the same. In terms of the relevance and effectiveness of the QCE instruments, the assistant professors gave the highest rating, followed by the professors, instructors and associate professors. There are problems encountered by the respondents relative to the CCE and QCE evaluation, however, they are manageable considering that they have identified solutions to address the problems encountered.
References
A. BOOKS
Buchana, R., et al. Preliminary Report of the Faculty Professional Growth Committee (EO116738). St. Louis: St. Louis Junior College District, 1974.
Calmorin, Laurentina P. Educational Research Measurement and Evaluation. 2nd ed.; Manila, Philippines: National Bookstore, 1994.
De Guzman, Estefania S. Evolving and Testing of a Faculty Performance Evaluation Model: Philippine Education in the Third Millennium. Catarman, Philippines: 6Ns Enterprise UEP, 2005.
Ebel, Robert L. Measuring Educational Achievement. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965.
Ferguson, George A. & Yoshio Takane. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. 6th ed.; New York, U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1989.
Hawes, Gene R. & Lynne Salop, Hawes. The Concise Dictionary of Education. New York: Hudson Group Book, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1982.
Rabago, Lilia M. & Diana L. Ferrer. Science and Technology 1. Philippines: Vibal Publishing House, 1997.
Romualdez, Lordes. Modern Agriculture for Tropical Schools. Oxford University Press in Association with Felte Books Sales, Inc., 1989.
Tang, Kendel S. The Development and Validation of An Instrument to Measure Teacher Effectiveness. Manila, Philippines: De La Salle College Press, 1973.
Walpole, Ronald E. Introduction to Statistics. 3rd ed.’ New York: Prentice Hall Book Co., Inc., 1982.
B. JOURNALS/MAGAZINES/MANUALS/PUBLICATIONS
Annex 1: Qualitative Contribution Evaluation, QCE for Instructors and Assistant Professors.
Annex 2: Qualitative Contribution Evaluation, QCE for Associate Professors and Professors.
A Team of Experts. “Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Agriculture and Education.” Anmol Publications PVT. LTD, New Delhi - 1100021, India, 2000.
Bongcodin, Emelia T. National Budget Circular No. 461, June 1, 1998.
Bernardo, Allan B. I. “A 100-Year Proposition for the Evolution of Philippine Colleges and Universities, Philippine Education in the Third Millennium: Trends, Issues and Challenges, Concerns.” 6Ns Enterprise, 2005.
Centra, John A. “Faculty Leaders’ Responses to Post-Tenure Evaluation Practices.” Community/Junior College Quarterly, 1992.
Garcia, Ester A. ``No Quantum Leap.” Quatripartite Meeting on NBC 461, December 12, 2001.
Manual of Information for Private Schools. 7th ed.; 1970.
Marsh, Hewbert W., et al. “Validity of Student Evaluation of Instructional Effectiveness: A Comparison of Faculty Self-Evaluation and Evaluation by Their Students.” Journal of Educational Psychology, April, 1979.
Pada, Frederic So. & Angel C. Alcala. “Implementing Guidelines of NCC, 1998,” NBC 461: Latest Development (Part II). Statistical Section, U.S. Embassy. The Education Act B. P. 232, 1982.
C. UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
Atherton, Nola B. “Initial Assessment of the DAT Program.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Northern Iloilo Polytechnic State College, Barotac Viejo Campus, 1996.
Barreto, Evelyn P. “Initial Assessment of the BAT Program.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Northern Iloilo Polytechnic State College, Barotac Viejo Campus, 1996.
Bernadit, Leonida Sarzata. “Competencies of Technology and Home Economics Teacher in the Division of Calbayog.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Samar State Polytechnic College, Catbalogan, Samar, 2000.
Decatoria, Gloria R. “Assessment of the Competency Level of Teachers and the Factors that Influence Their Teaching in Technology and Home Economics Subjects.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Samar State Polytechnic College, Catbalogan, Samar, 1996.
Doroja, Cecila C. “Interpersonal Values and Competency Needs to Public Elementary School Principals: Inputs to A Model Supervisory Enhancement Program.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State Polytechnic College, Catbalogan, Samar, 2002.
Elizalde, Julita A. “Competency Level of Guidance Counselors in Samar: Inputs to Policy Redirection.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State Polytechnic College, Catbalogan, Samar, 2000.
Espina, Isabel R. “Effectiveness of Master Teachers Assistance and Instructional Competence of Non-Master Teachers: A Correlation.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, State Polytechnic College, Catbalogan, Samar, 2000.
Guillermo, Rolando B. “Qualities of Instructors and Professors.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Northern Iloilo Polytechnic State College, Barotac Viejo Campus, 1996.
Olisco, Aida J. “Containing Education Activities of Teachers in Selected Public Schools in the Division of Leyte.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, State Polytechnic College, Catbalogan, Samar, 1996.
Paterno, Elena S. “Correlates of Performance Trilogy of Functions of Faculty in the State Colleges and Universities in Eastern Visayas.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Leyte Institute of Technology, Tacloban City, 1997.
Villena, Nimfa D. “An Assessment of the Enrichment of the Agricultural Arts Program as Perceived by Students and Teachers.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Leyte Agro Industrial School, 1996.
D. ELECTRONIC AND OTHER SOURCES
Aleamoni, Laurence M. “Student Ratings of Instruction.” in Handbook of Teacher Evaluation, Edited by Jason Millman, Beverly Hills, California: SAGE Publications, 1981, www.vtaide.com/png/ERIC/studentevaluation.htm.
Boise State University Policy Handbook. “Standard 5 Unit Evaluation of Professional Education Faculty Performance.” www.education.boisestate.edu/survey/performance-summary.htm.
Boston University Council. “Evaluation of Faculty Performance Policy. February 6, 1996, www.bu.edu/faculty/handbook/policies/policy-evaluation.htm.
Cashin, William E. “Use of Teaching Portfolio and Student Evaluations for Summative Evaluation,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Atlanta, GA, April 12-16, 1993.
Cherry, Robert L., et al. Faculty Evaluation Systems: A Research Study of Selected Community Colleges in New York State. Albany: State University of New York, Faculty Council of Community Colleges (EO 158 809).
Coburn, Louisa. “Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance.” ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests Measurements and Evaluation Princeton New Jersey: 1984-08-00, www.vtaide.com/png/ERIC/studentevaluation.htm.
COE Promotion and Tenure Task Force. “Expectation for Tenure, Promotion and Faculty Performance.” College of Education University of North Texas, August, 2001, www.COE.unt.edu.
Dictionary of Education, 2000. Directory of Official, Key Positions, Officers of the Administration/Dean/Directors and Head of SUCs Respondents. Kansas State University, Office of the Academic Services, January 18, 2005, www.ksu.edu/academicservices/depthread/promotion.chapI,htm/
Organizational Charts of SUCs Respondents.
Pada, Frederick So., Ph.D. PASUC Executive Director. “Historical Evolution of NBC 462.” Excerpts from the Speech Delivered during the Two-day Action Planning Session of the CHED, December 15, 1998.
Rifkin, Tronie. “The Status and Scope of Faculty Evaluation.” ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges, Los Angeles, CA 1995-06-00, www.eric.digest.org/1996-1/status.htm.
Scriven Michael. Beyond Formative and Summative Evaluation, Chapter 2. Milbrey W, MCLaughlin and DC, Philips; 1991, jan.ucc.nou.edu/edteach/etc.proposal/evaluation/summative_vs_formative.htm.
Scriven, Michael. Evaluation. Thesaurus, 4th ed.; Newbury Park, CA SAGE Publication, 1996.
Second Evaluation NBC 461. Cut-Off Date: June 30, 2001 of SUCs in Eastern Visayas.
Teaching Personnel Profile of UEP, EVSU, SSU, ESSU, SLSU, LSU, PIT, NIT, SSCAF, and TTMIST.
Webster Comprehensive Encyclopedia Edition Dictionary. Chicago: Ferguson Publishing Co., 1998.
Webster Dictionary, 1999.
West Virginia Department of Education. “Performance Evaluation of School Personnel.” State of West Virginia, Charleston W. V., www.wvde.state.wv.us/p5310.htm.
Weston, Cynthia, et al. A Model for Understanding Formative Evaluation in Instructional Design. Educational Technology Research and Develop, 1995, www.jan.ucc.edu/edtech/etc667/proposal/evaluation/summaive_vs_fromative.htm.
Worthen, Sanders and Fitzpatrick. “The Evaluation of the Educational and Career Opportunities System (ECES).” www.students,edu,uiuc,edu/catrey/Evaluation%20proposal,htm.
Young, Raymond J. & Yoswa, Gwalamubisi. “Perceptions about Current and Ideal Methods and Purposes of Faculty Evaluation.” Community College Review, 1986, www.ericdigest.org/1996-1/status.htm.
