Development of Departmentalize Entrance Examination for Samar State University
Keywords:
Departmentalize, Development, Entrance ExaminationAbstract
The study aimed to develop the departmentalized entrance examination to assess the current level ability of the student. This chapter discussed the methods and materials on how the study developed. It provides a detailed description of the methodology that was used in the study. The chapter includes the purpose and research questions, research designs, and sample and data collection procedures, variables and data analysis techniques for the study. The study developed the automated entrance examination system for Samar State University that creates, modifies, updates, stores student records and performs student processes and transactions. It can give users the ability for workflow, storage, retrieval and security. It was effective in terms of system performance, security, accuracy and it is user friendly. Based on findings of the study, the following conclusions were considered, The research project was successfully designed and developed for the entrance examination system. The entire system used multiple choice types of questions and blocking access. This system approach is believed to offer such automatic assessment. It can also be used to promote more effective learning by testing a range of skills, knowledge and understanding. Based on the findings and conclusions drawn from the study, the following measures are hereby recommended, the future proponents must develop a wider scope of the study.
References
Ağazade, A., Caner, H., Hasipoğlu, H. & Civelek, A . (2014), 'Turkish
University Entrance Test and Academic Achievement in
Undergraduate Programs: A Criterion- related Validity Study', Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 4582 - 4590. Al-Husseini, K. Risk Management Tools In The Design Of Automated
Systems . P 287 Interactive Systems: Problems Of Human- Computer
Interaction . Ulyanovsk , Russia: USTU, 2017. − 290 p. UDC
518 (04) .ISBN 978-5-9795-1692-9 . Altınparmak, S., Taner, Ş., Türk, S. M., & Eser, E. (2012). Life quality of
teenagers in second level İzmir/Bornova State Schools. Journal of
Anatolian Psychiatry Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13, 167-173. Archana M and Leelavathi R (2015). An Effective Computer Based
Examination System for University. International Journal of
Science and Research (IJSR). Bhuiyan, N. (2011). A framework for successful new product development. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. Bodmann, S. M. & Robinson, D. H. (2004). Speed And Performance
Dif erences Among Computer-Based And Paper-Pencil Tests.
Chanthinok, K. and Jantarajaturapath,P. (2020). A System for Item
Analysis Examination on Cloud Computing Service. Journal of
Computer Science. Volume 16 No. 6, 802-816. Daitol O. (2012). Entrance Exam Results and Performance in First Year
Courses of Engineering Students: A Correlation Analysis, Vol. 2 No. 1. Fagbola T., Adigun A., and Oke A. (2013). Computer-Based Test (Cbt)
System For University Academic Enterprise Examination. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research
Volume 2, Issue 8. Fluck, A., Pullen, D. and Harper C. (2009). Case study of a computer
based Examination System. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 25(4), 509-523
Hosseinia, M., Abidinb, M. and Baghdarniac, M. (2014). Comparability of
Test Results of Computer Based Tests (CBT) and Paper and Pencil
Tests (PPT) among English Language Learners in Iran. Elsevier
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 659 – 667.
Jamila, M., Tariqb , R. and Shamic, P. (2012). Computer-Based Vs Paper- Based Examinations: Perceptions Of University Teachers. The
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. Volume 11 I
ssue 4. Laguador, J. and Pureza, R. (2013). Development and Evaluation
of Computer Based Qualifying Exam for Incoming Mechanical
and Electronics Engineering Students. International Journal of
Management, IT and Engineering. Volume 3, Issue 8. Leelavathi R. (2015) “ A Novel Computerized Examination System” Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Avinashilingam
Institute of Home Science and Higher Education for women, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu. Lim , E., Ong, B., Smith, E. and Seet, R. (2006). Computer-based versus
pen-and paper testing: students' perception. Ann Acad Med
Singapor 35(9):599-603. Montalbo1, A., Evangelista, Y. and Bernal, M. (2018). Asia Pacific Journal
of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 6, No. 3. Mosheshe J (2017). Data Warehouse System in Shell Corporation Oil and
Gas Upstream Market. J Comput Eng Inf Technol 6:5. doi:
4172/2324- 9307.1000185.
Orbeta, A., V. Paqueo, K Gonzales, S. Cortes and A. Adona (2016) “A
Review of Student Financial Assistance Programs for Higher
Education” Processed. Pommerich M.(2004) Developing Computerized Versions of Paper-and-Pencil
Tests: Mode Effects for Passage-Based Tests. The Journal of
Technology, Learning And Assessment. Volume 2 no. 6. Ramos M. C & Velasquez J. E(2003) Design And Development Of An Online
Exam Maker And Checker, Lyceum Of The Philippines University, Batangas City, Philippines, ISSN 22773061. Silfverberg, D. and Orbeta, A. (2016).The Role of Entrance Exams in
Academic Performance of Students with Low Socioeconomic
Background: Evidence from the SGP-PA. 13th National
Convention on Statistics. Philippine Statistics Authority. 13th Edition. Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/content/role- entrance-exams-academic-performance students-low- socioeconomic-background-evidence-sgp. Visual Studio (2002). Wine HQ. CodeWeavers. Retrieved
from https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?iId=892&s
Class=applicati on.
